Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum

Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum (https://tree-of-souls.net/index.php)
-   Debate (https://tree-of-souls.net/forumdisplay.php?f=47)
-   -   Property. (https://tree-of-souls.net/showthread.php?t=1499)

ZenitYerkes 05-24-2010 10:38 PM

Property.
 
I believe it is simply and exclusively a mere abstract thought that doesn't change the nature of the owned thing at all.

Though it prevents us from killing ourselves when the "Whose this land?" questions arises.

But on the other hand, it also makes us kill ourselves when the answer is given, and the owner is not you.

Property: need or arrogance?
(cheesy newspaper headline)

Sacred Tsahaylu 05-24-2010 10:45 PM

You need to explain more what you mean. Are you suggesting that we don't own anything and that we are merely in possession of objects? That is what the Native Americans believe, and I'm sure it's a belief commonly held among indigenous tribes.

fkeua vrrtep 05-24-2010 11:11 PM

It's not a belief , it's a fact .

You can't own something which you cannot control .

Woodsprite 05-25-2010 04:53 AM

The Na'vi fought and died for their land (and for the Tree of Souls); so did the native Americans. "This is our land!" Capitalism, right there.

Spock 05-25-2010 06:48 AM

Woodsprite, notice how the word "our" is used. That would indicate that the Na'vi are collectivists not capitalists.

Woodsprite 05-25-2010 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spock (Post 43485)
Woodsprite, notice how the word "our" is used. That would indicate that the Na'vi are collectivists not capitalists.

That'd be true, but only if it was used in a certain sense. Jake was referring to the land as the Na'vi's. If he were truly referring to it in the collective sense, he would've meant it's the human's land as well.

Spock 05-25-2010 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsprite (Post 43488)
That'd be true, but only if it was used in a certain sense. Jake was referring to the land as the Na'vi's. If he were truly referring to it in the collective sense, he would've meant it's the human's land as well.

Well, I would argue most senses. Jake's definitions are irrelevant. He used "our" which pertains to a collective society. I may also add that we see no evidence of property ownership by individual Na'vi when refering to land.

Woodsprite 05-25-2010 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spock (Post 43491)
Well, I would argue most senses. Jake's definitions are irrelevant. He used "our" which pertains to a collective society.

Well then that's your interpretation, and noted. But I stand by my guns on this one: Jake was referring to the Na'vi only, not everyone on Pandora.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spock (Post 43491)
I may also add that we see no evidence of property ownership by individual Na'vi when refering to land.

True, since the Na'vi are all part of a tribal society. Native life, whether it be the Na'vi, or any tribe here on earth, tends to resemble life in a boarding house. Everyone partakes; everyone shares certain things; everyone knows everyone.

Spock 05-25-2010 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsprite (Post 43516)
Well then that's your interpretation, and noted. But I stand by my guns on this one: Jake was referring to the Na'vi only, not everyone on Pandora.

I see that. I just wanted to not how the Na'vi that Jake was refering to were a collective society, the movie exemplifies how well collectivism works.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsprite (Post 43516)
True, since the Na'vi are all part of a tribal society. Native life, whether it be the Na'vi, or any tribe here on earth, tends to resemble life in a boarding house. Everyone partakes; everyone shares certain things; everyone knows everyone.

The smell of collectivism. Lovely. :party:

That's the point I wanted to make anyway.

Woodsprite 05-25-2010 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spock (Post 43518)
I see that. I just wanted to not how the Na'vi that Jake was refering to were a collective society, the movie exemplifies how well collectivism works.

The smell of collectivism. Lovely. :party:

That's the point I wanted to make anyway.

Within tribal societies, though; only with tribes. Gotta make that distinction. ;)

Spock 05-25-2010 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsprite (Post 43519)
Within tribal societies, though; only with tribes. Gotta make that distinction. ;)

I believe a true socialists utopia is yet to be demonstrated. In time my friend. Let's leave it at that.

Woodsprite 05-25-2010 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spock (Post 43520)
I believe a true socialists utopia is yet to be demonstrated. In time my friend. Let's leave it at that.

Fair enough. :) /handshake

Spock 05-25-2010 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsprite (Post 43521)
Fair enough. :) /handshake

Politics needs more people like you and me. ;)

josie20 05-25-2010 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spock (Post 43533)
Politics needs more people like you and me. ;)

Hey, if either of you run for president, you've got my vote! :D

Loverofnature 05-25-2010 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by josie20 (Post 43733)
hey, if either of you run for president, you've got my vote! :d

+1 :d


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All images and clips of Avatar are the exclusive property of 20th Century Fox.