Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum

Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum (https://tree-of-souls.net/index.php)
-   General Avatar Discussion (https://tree-of-souls.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Why Cameron Failed. (https://tree-of-souls.net/showthread.php?t=3186)

EywaBlessMe 12-02-2010 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeylovesgaia (Post 114432)
You should have made Quaritch, Selfridge, and the RDA more of a clear villain

Wrong!
That would have been too simplistic and manipulative.
In the real world, things are not so cut and dried, black hat versus white hat.
In the real world, everyone and everything is some shade of gray, capable of great good and great evil amidst the mass of ordinary.

Rainbowhawk1993 12-02-2010 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rapunzel77 (Post 114455)
I don't think he failed. Most people saw it to be entertained and it succeeded because we have a conversation going about all the themes in the movie and what the messages are. In fact, some of the messages in Avatar, like with any book or movie, may not be what the original writer/director, etc intended. Many people dismissed Avatar for being too simplistic and black/white which we know isn't true. I don't think that Cameron or anyone else can expect people to change over night but if it brings up thought provoking issues that people can actually talk about then he did his job.

I am a conservative on social issues and liberal on some political issues but after seeing Avatar, it got me thinking and pondering about various issues related to the environment, etc. Good art should make one think and allow for conversation. I feel that the "conservative" response was sad. They readily dismissed it without truly watching it. I think it could be due to some of the cringe worthy lines. I love Avatar but there are a few clunky lines that can take someone out of the movie and into the current political situation. That may be why some people were upset and dismissive of the movie.

That's it! The proof is hear, we see issues it addresses and we disscus them. I was suprised to see this site with very disscusive topics on morals. I mean, alot of us hear now have a resentment ageinst greedy corporations.

I'm a liberal, but I try to see it from both sides some times but most of the time I just dissagree with the Conservitive reasons. It just doesn't seem reasonable to me. And that part about how conservatists dismiss avatar off the bat when they hear about it, that is just sad. I have a friend who's partents were hard core conservatisis and with out even seeing the movie, they don't allow him to see it:angry:. It's so sad to learn that there are some people who are completely ignorient to everything but there own belief.

Tsyal Makto 12-02-2010 10:48 PM

- We're here. As Zenit said, that says something...

- There's thousands of others out there that See, but are not on the forums, or only posted once back in the hay-day of PAD.

- Activist groups/people fighting oppression all over the world have taken up the image of Avatar and the Na'vi to symbolize their own struggles.

- James Cameron is now one of the major faces of environmentalism and indigenous rights.

Cameron didn't fail. He succeeded, quite epicly I might add. :D

As for conservatism, yeah, the backlash is pretty ridiculous, but that's corporate-sponsored neo-conservatism for you. I'm sure old-school Eisenhower-conservatives wouldn't have reacted that way. In fact, I'm sure the message would have resonated with many of them (rapunzel77 is a perfect example :)). Basically what the right-wing has become is a mass of corporatists and luddites who can't fathom that middle-aged white men don't rule the world anymore. So they see something like Avatar that embodies everything they hate, and for lack of a better term, it makes them have a hissy-fit. There's plenty of other, more reasonable (though less vocal) conservatives out there.

rapunzel77 12-02-2010 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rainbowhawk1993 (Post 114463)
That's it! The proof is hear, we see issues it addresses and we disscus them. I was suprised to see this site with very disscusive topics on morals. I mean, alot of us hear now have a resentment ageinst greedy corporations.

Exactly. This is what good art does. It helps to wake us up at least to the point that we are talking to each other. We see it so often in the media and general culture, very few people with opposite views actually talking to each other. Instead there is too much bickering and hate.

Quote:

I'm a liberal, but I try to see it from both sides some times but most of the time I just dissagree with the Conservitive reasons. It just doesn't seem reasonable to me.
I understand where you are coming from but also keep in mind that very few people can be bunched up into liberal or conservative groups. I am a mixture of both. On some moral issues I cannot waver in my conservative position. On everything else, I am more liberal. I have always loved the environment before Avatar but what it did do was awaken in me to have a greater concern for it as well as learning to listen to others. Before Avatar I was listening to more conservative groups but when I saw what their reaction was to the movie, I stopped listening to them because I was disgusted by their reaction. They took it personally when there is very little if any indication in the movie that it was aimed at them at all.

Quote:

And that part about how conservatists dismiss avatar off the bat when they hear about it, that is just sad. I have a friend who's partents were hard core conservatisis and with out even seeing the movie, they don't allow him to see it:angry:. It's so sad to learn that there are some people who are completely ignorient to everything but there own belief.
This is very sad. I grew up in a conservative home and most of my friends irl are also conservative and it irks me sometimes to see some of the knee jerk reactions. It makes us look bad, especially those of us who are also very religiously devout. I enjoyed Avatar and I took from it some very important lessons. Some lessons that perhaps Cameron didn't anticipate. People will read into any work of art weather it is a movie, play, book, painting, sculpture, music, etc anything that they wish to read. Some will only see hate and evil and others will only see love and joy. Very few people will see the more profound messages that can be drawn. Sure, some will only see simplicity and scoff at that but sometimes it is the simplest of stories that we need to hear most.

ScottWashburn 12-02-2010 11:12 PM

Actually Cameron did fail in one respect (and I've mentioned this before). He made the RDA and the security forces, indeed, all the humans on Pandora, far too American. The RDA is supposed to be a multi-national super-corporation, but all we see are people who look, talk and act like Americans. There should have been people with French, German, English and Russian accents. Obvious Japanese and Chinese and Indian people (Max looks Indian, but he still talks like an American).

Why is this important? Well, I personally know quite a few people who adamantly refuse to watch Avatar because they've heard it is anti-American and anti-US Military. It's not, but it could easily seem that way. One of the early trailers even makes it seem like the RDA security forces are US Marines and some of my veteran friends will not watch a movie where US troops get masacred. So, by doing it the way he did (and it would have cost nothing at all to add some obvious non-Americans) Cameron lost a lot of people who might well have loved Avatar as much as we do.

Ashen Key 12-02-2010 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ScottWashburn (Post 114472)
Actually Cameron did fail in one respect (and I've mentioned this before). He made the RDA and the security forces, indeed, all the humans on Pandora, far too American. The RDA is supposed to be a multi-national super-corporation, but all we see are people who look, talk and act like Americans. There should have been people with French, German, English and Russian accents. Obvious Japanese and Chinese and Indian people (Max looks Indian, but he still talks like an American).

Why is this important? Well, I personally know quite a few people who adamantly refuse to watch Avatar because they've heard it is anti-American and anti-US Military. It's not, but it could easily seem that way. One of the early trailers even makes it seem like the RDA security forces are US Marines and some of my veteran friends will not watch a movie where US troops get masacred. So, by doing it the way he did (and it would have cost nothing at all to add some obvious non-Americans) Cameron lost a lot of people who might well have loved Avatar as much as we do.

There is that, and there is also the fact that some of us here in the international audience are getting pretty sick of the future = Americans. It would have been far more powerful (and gotten the whole 'international company thing across) to have some non-Americans there. Given the blonde woman in the control tower a Russian accent; Wainfleet British; some of the Avatars and scientists different accents. Anything. Something. And it would have been far more imaginative than just 'the future is the US'

Rainbowhawk1993 12-02-2010 11:27 PM

Thats not the U.S. out there, Thats a private sercurty force for a Corparation and they were hiered to do their dirty work. As I recall, The U.S. has learned from it's mistake of removing indains in the 19th century. There are contries out there who do more treable things than the U.S. Now a days we try diplomicy, diplomicy, diplomicy.

Ashen Key 12-02-2010 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rainbowhawk1993 (Post 114478)
Thats not the U.S. out there, Thats a private sercurty force for a Corparation and they were hiered to do their dirty work. As I recall, The U.S. has learned from it's mistake of removing indains in the 19th century. There are contries out there who do more treable things than the U.S. Now a days we try diplomicy, diplomicy, diplomicy.

Diplomacy with the edge of 'if you do not do as we say, we will ruin your county' - OH so easy to do now that there is the 'War on Terror'. Previously, the excuse was the Cold War, which gave way to not only invasions but also coups and assassinations. *shrugs*

But the fact of the matter is that an organized made up entirely of Americans reads as 'metaphor for US'. Might not be US government (not exactly, but given how much pressure companies can put on the government...), but US companies who go in and take what they want with military backing?

Yep. At least to this Australian, the RDA still read as 'America' in a lot of ways.

Neytiri. 12-02-2010 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ashen Key (Post 114481)
Diplomacy with the edge of 'if you do not do as we say, we will ruin your county' - OH so easy to do now that there is the 'War on Terror'. Previously, the excuse was the Cold War, which gave way to not only invasions but also coups and assassinations. *shrugs*

But the fact of the matter is that an organized made up entirely of Americans reads as 'metaphor for US'. Might not be US government (not exactly, but given how much pressure companies can put on the government...), but US companies who go in and take what they want with military backing?

Yep. At least to this Australian, the RDA still read as 'America' in a lot of ways.

If you haven't noticed after we "ruin" your country we spend billions to build it back up and give them a government that isn't a dictatorship, Ever heard of japan? They might not be allowed to build a military but there economy is off the charts.

Ashen Key 12-02-2010 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neytiri. (Post 114489)
If you haven't noticed after we "ruin" your country we spend billions to build it back up and give them a government that isn't a dictatorship, Ever heard of japan? They might not be allowed to build a military but there economy is off the charts.

...You also have, off-hand, Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Nicaragua, Honduras, Iran, Guatemala, South Vietnam, Chile, Grenada, Panama, and that's before you mention Afghanistan, and Iraq. A lot of those countries aren't doing THAT well. *shrugs* It's an empire thing, it just doesn't get mentioned a lot, which is understandable, as empires tend to be a little shifty over what they actually do.

But that's partly my point (and really, I don't particularly want to get into the history of US foreign policy - it depresses me, and is mostly OT) - by making all the characters American, the movie can so easily read to those NOT in the US that this is just more of the same. So, yeah, the movie has anti-American sentiments, which could have been nicely avoided if Cameron had cast put more of an international cast in the movie.

Neytiri. 12-03-2010 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ashen Key (Post 114498)
...You also have, off-hand, Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Nicaragua, Honduras, Iran, Guatemala, South Vietnam, Chile, Grenada, Panama, and that's before you mention Afghanistan, and Iraq. A lot of those countries aren't doing THAT well. *shrugs* It's an empire thing, it just doesn't get mentioned a lot, which is understandable, as empires tend to be a little shifty over what they actually do.

But that's partly my point - by making all the characters American, the movie can so easily read to those NOT in the US that this is just more of the same. So, yeah, the movie has anti-American sentiments, which could have been nicely avoided if Cameron had cast put more of an international cast in the movie.

Yeah I'm not sure why he didn't vary the characters, I can't really see him being like "screw everyone else, all humans from now on are American" though

Tsyal Makto 12-03-2010 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rainbowhawk1993 (Post 114478)
Thats not the U.S. out there, Thats a private sercurty force for a Corparation and they were hiered to do their dirty work. As I recall, The U.S. has learned from it's mistake of removing indains in the 19th century. There are contries out there who do more treable things than the U.S. Now a days we try diplomicy, diplomicy, diplomicy.

Exactly. Like I said once before, if a government went to Pandora, and not a profit-seeking corporation, things would not have gone the way they did. It would've been a mission of diplomacy, not greed.

Though too, in all honestly, the recent Wikileaks dump has shown us that the world still has a lot of work to do on diplomacy. We need to learn to coexist on this planet before we drag someone from another planet into this.

And I'm not sure we're seeing America in Avatar. More than likely we're seeing the end result of 150 years of this...






LOVEavatar 12-03-2010 12:15 AM

He could've just forgot.... lol? :P

Haven't notice it until you all mentioned it. I guess it will stay to be one of those things we'll probably never get to know about JC. *continues with life* :P

tm20 12-03-2010 12:48 AM

this thread is a FAIL because of 1 simple fact, James Cameron never fails

TxonTirea 12-03-2010 01:00 AM

Damn it TM20. I was going to say that, I shall say it anyway.

This thread is a fail. Just because the film failed to reach a few people, it didn't stop it becoming the highest grossing movie of all time. Kthxbai. <3


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All images and clips of Avatar are the exclusive property of 20th Century Fox.