Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum

Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum (https://tree-of-souls.net/index.php)
-   Debate (https://tree-of-souls.net/forumdisplay.php?f=47)
-   -   Any way to prevent a nuclear war? (https://tree-of-souls.net/showthread.php?t=3199)

SaphirJD 12-05-2010 12:37 PM

well, the most and simple way would be just destroying nuclear weapons and in general and dont allow production of new ones.

But as long as there are crazy People in our World, as long there are crazy things happening.

Quite depressive, isn't it?

Advent 12-05-2010 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaphirJD (Post 114981)
well, the most and simple way would be just destroying nuclear weapons and in general and dont allow production of new ones.

You'd have to destroy quite a few- thousands.

Spartan 12-07-2010 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Illusive Man (Post 114912)
Nuclear weapons have only ever existed to prevent war. I thought you would know this too Zenit. That's why nuclear weapons are a necessity on this earth otherwise warfare would be a lot more common.

noo. the atomic bomb was produced to end WW2 and to show the russians we were better.. the only reason they prevent war is because everyone knows their destructive power

Spock 12-07-2010 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartan (Post 115771)
noo. the atomic bomb was produced to end WW2 and to show the russians we were better.. the only reason they prevent war is because everyone knows their destructive power

The train of thought changed pretty quickly though as governments saw the power of nuclear weapons to prevent war. Nuclear weapons could never really be deployed in a global war due to collateral damage.

Spartan 12-07-2010 09:21 PM

exactly, but you said the only reason they were produced was to prevent war.. which was untrue, but later on and now thats their perpose :)

Spock 12-07-2010 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spartan (Post 115780)
exactly, but you said the only reason they were produced was to prevent war.. which was untrue, but later on and now thats their perpose :)

I meant for the comment to be ambiguous as to prove my point to Zenit. It's no matter anyway.

ZenitYerkes 12-07-2010 09:31 PM

Why making a weapon that will never be used?

LOVEavatar 12-07-2010 09:35 PM

To create fear I'd say.

Spock 12-07-2010 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LOVEavatar (Post 115792)
To create fear I'd say.

Exactly. It's fear of retaliation that prevents nuclear war.

LOVEavatar 12-07-2010 09:43 PM

I mean, isn't that what the Cold War was? Just scaring each other by developing new mass destruction weapons planned to be used against the other side?; but never came to use.

Spock 12-07-2010 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LOVEavatar (Post 115796)
I mean, isn't that what the Cold War was? Just scaring each other by developing new mass destruction weapons planned to be used against the other side?; but never came to use.

In essence yes.

ZenitYerkes 12-07-2010 10:03 PM

So we're all pointing guns to each other right now, in order to prevent shooting anyone down.

Nice.

LOVEavatar 12-07-2010 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenitYerkes (Post 115809)
So we're all pointing guns to each other right now, in order to prevent shooting anyone down.

Nice.

The big guns, yea. Not the small ones :P

Why criminals/cops have guns, just to provoke by scaring the target from doing anything stupid. In most cases. Let's just exclude any occasion where the criminal/cop could be a gun triggered moron, like Grace explained :P

ZenitYerkes 12-07-2010 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LOVEavatar (Post 115813)
The big guns, yea. Not the small ones :P

Why criminals/cops have guns, just to provoke by scaring the target from doing anything stupid. In most cases. Let's just exclude any occasion where the criminal/cop could be a gun triggered moron, like Grace explained :P

The problem with handling big guns is that you don't only kill the criminal but other 5 million people, y'know.

That's sorta gross.

LOVEavatar 12-07-2010 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenitYerkes (Post 115814)
The problem with handling big guns is that you don't only kill the criminal but other 5 million people, y'know.

That's sorta gross.

What I-Man said:

Quote:

Nuclear weapons could never really be deployed in a global war due to collateral damage.

Unless, there now is a trigger happy moron behind the buttons... we should worry. The only option would to be sacrifice few for the many (seen global population wise) And I agree... strongly! It is gross :S.
Still, I don't believe there are any war solved through diplomacy/politics only. How could it then be a war? (define war?) (If you exclude the Cold "War")


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All images and clips of Avatar are the exclusive property of 20th Century Fox.