Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum

Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum (https://tree-of-souls.net/index.php)
-   General Discussion (https://tree-of-souls.net/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Does Anyone Else Find It Depressing/Sad... (https://tree-of-souls.net/showthread.php?t=3842)

Tsyal Makto 03-12-2011 03:24 AM

Does Anyone Else Find It Depressing/Sad...
 
...that it took a massive earthquake, 1000+ deaths, and 2 possible nuclear core meltdowns, to finally push Charlie Sheen out of the headlines?

Not even the crisis in Libya could do that.

Really shows the priorities of the mainstream media.:facepalm:

Hunter of the Glade 03-12-2011 03:31 AM

:facepalm: to that...

txen 03-12-2011 03:31 AM

What's even sadder is now the regime could feel that they are not being watched quite so closely and may feel emboldened to commit worse atrocities than they have been.

Now I live just outside Los Angeles and I heard a story about Mr. Sheen today...

Banefull 03-12-2011 03:32 AM

Exactly

I've thrown up my hands in disgust and stopped watching news on the television a long time ago.

James of terra 03-12-2011 03:40 AM

Media, has turned into a big bisness, and yes it is sad.

Ashen Key 03-12-2011 03:48 AM

Haven't noticed Charlie Sheen being in the headlines over here in Aus, for what it's worth. So, it's not everywhere.

josie20 03-12-2011 05:11 AM

This is why I started listening to NPR and watching PBS for my news.

Isard 03-12-2011 05:21 AM

But he's a mother****ing F-16 bro!



EDIT: also, Al Jazeera is the best news source out there.

Советский меч 03-12-2011 05:41 AM

I watch Fox news when I need a good laugh.

tallbluewanderer 03-12-2011 06:12 AM

... who's Charlie Sheen?

iron_jones 03-12-2011 08:43 AM

I, personally, could care less about Charlie Sheen or the people affected by the tsunami.
if you feel the need to question me on why please send me a PM (to avoid getting off topic)!!!

But it is sad.

Woodsprite 03-12-2011 12:22 PM

...News is news. Charlie Sheen or not, it isn't like television news is the only news out there. Watch television when you want to see what the news stations have to offer, and find other resources to find out other bits of news that you want to find out about.

It's not that hard... but for some, apparently, it is. And thus, that makes T.V. the evil bad baddies.

:facepalm: to that.^

Human No More 03-12-2011 01:14 PM

:facepalm:
Yeah, it's stupid, but what annoys me even more is this ridiculous scaremongering.
Woodsprite, I agree, but you have to admit he has been getting far more coverage than he deserved (and I say that without even owning a TV).

Aaron 03-12-2011 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Isard (Post 133632)
EDIT: also, Al Jazeera is the best news source out there.

:D :D I have to agree. Best place for world-relevant news 99% of the time. Not always the first place to have a story, but you NEVER see this kind of garbage-news splattered on the front page.

rapunzel77 03-12-2011 04:34 PM

Yeah, I agree but this happens often. When it is a "slow" news day, they go to the silly stories involving Charlie Sheen, et al. When more serious stuff happens, they go to that story at the expense of ignoring the other serious situations in the world (ie. the Libyan situation). Granted, the Japan earthquake/tsunami is one of the worst on record for Japan so that will get more headlines. Also, its an ongoing disaster so it will get more coverage.

Sothis 03-12-2011 10:45 PM

::shrug:: The news media will report whatever they think people are interested in hearing about. Not every story will be "serious business," all the time. If you don't like hearing/reading about Charlie Sheen, then don't watch those stories or read those articles.

I'm not personally following the Charlie Sheen drama, but some people DO want to hear about it, and I don't see why my preferences should invalidate someone else's. "Newsworthiness" is a subjective quality, which is why there is a wide selection of news outlets to satisfy a wide diversity of audiences.

Also, for the record, the NY Times ran waaay more headlines about Libya than about Charlie Sheen. Most would consider NY Times part of "mainstream media," seeing how it's the single most popular American online newspaper, and the third largest American print newspaper. Granted, I'm sure there are other mainstream news outlets that focus more on the "trivial" stuff. I guess my point is: I feel like "mainstream media" is too broad a group to make sweeping generalizations about their "priorities."

Don't get me wrong... I agree that there's lots of weaknesses and catch-22s associated with how news reporting is done. I just don't find it very productive to shake my fist at the media for sometimes reporting stuff I don't personally find interesting.

tm20 03-12-2011 11:21 PM

nothing on charlie sheen over here. i think its just america, alot of idiots over there would rather watch that sort of stuff rather than more important issues.

Sothis 03-13-2011 12:09 AM

So you're saying Australian media never runs entertainment news? Interesting...

Ashen Key 03-13-2011 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sothis (Post 133743)
So you're saying Australian media never runs entertainment news? Interesting...

Oh, it does. But something like Charlie Sheen losing it would really only hit on a REALLY slow day - he's not THAT famous, and also American. And combination of a bunch of natural disasters in the region and our government (both state and federal) doing...INTERESTING things at the moment, the general media has pretty much moved on, as far as I can tell.

Sothis 03-13-2011 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ashen Key (Post 133754)
Oh, it does. But something like Charlie Sheen losing it would really only hit on a REALLY slow day - he's not THAT famous, and also American. And combination of a bunch of natural disasters in the region and our government (both state and federal) doing...INTERESTING things at the moment, the general media has pretty much moved on, as far as I can tell.

Oh, I know. What I meant is that tm20's comment makes it sound as though Australian news doesn't even report on Australian entertainment news, ever. It totally makes sense that they wouldn't report on Charlie Sheen, specifically. But this:

Quote:

Originally Posted by tm20 (Post 133739)
i think its just America, alot of idiots over there would rather watch that sort of stuff rather than more important issues.

makes it sound like watching "that sort of stuff" is a solely American affliction.

I'm finding myself in an odd, devil's-advocate-y sort of position... I'm actually quite critical of American media and American society in general. But I guess it feels different when it's myself or my (American) friends going "WTF, our country is so messed up; we need to do better." People from other developed countries pointing and generalizing and going "you idiot Americans" leaves a different taste in my mouth. But don't worry, I know tm20 didn't mean anything personally.

Human No More 03-13-2011 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sothis (Post 133725)
::shrug:: The news media will report whatever they think people are interested in hearing about. Not every story will be "serious business," all the time. If you don't like hearing/reading about Charlie Sheen, then don't watch those stories or read those articles.

I'm not personally following the Charlie Sheen drama, but some people DO want to hear about it, and I don't see why my preferences should invalidate someone else's. "Newsworthiness" is a subjective quality, which is why there is a wide selection of news outlets to satisfy a wide diversity of audiences.

Also, for the record, the NY Times ran waaay more headlines about Libya than about Charlie Sheen. Most would consider NY Times part of "mainstream media," seeing how it's the single most popular American online newspaper, and the third largest American print newspaper. Granted, I'm sure there are other mainstream news outlets that focus more on the "trivial" stuff. I guess my point is: I feel like "mainstream media" is too broad a group to make sweeping generalizations about their "priorities."

Don't get me wrong... I agree that there's lots of weaknesses and catch-22s associated with how news reporting is done. I just don't find it very productive to shake my fist at the media for sometimes reporting stuff I don't personally find interesting.

Perfectly said :)

Tsawke`Iheyu 03-14-2011 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tallbluewanderer (Post 133640)
... who's Charlie Sheen?

The guy that plays Charlie in Two Men and a Half TV series. He was and is also involved in several conflicts inside and outside the media...

Mainstream is for money and audience. Big audiences are made on these sorts of covers, conflicts, divorces and missunderstood VIPs. Same here... the earthquake stopped being an issue and the news on several divorces started to show up again ! :angry: I just don't understand how people don't get sick through time of these subjects... Oh, yes... lack of wanting "more" :airquote: :facepalm: DAANG.

Stanley_9875 03-15-2011 10:06 AM

I find it sad Channel 7 (or channel 5 news i cant remember which I was watching yesterday) called Lady Gaga a "saint" because she made Japan Relief bracelets and all proceeds go to Japan Relief Efforts... I'm like what the hell, dont call gaga a saint because she does what hundreds of other people do... i was ready to throw something at the TV


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All images and clips of Avatar are the exclusive property of 20th Century Fox.