![]() |
Does Anyone Else Find It Depressing/Sad...
...that it took a massive earthquake, 1000+ deaths, and 2 possible nuclear core meltdowns, to finally push Charlie Sheen out of the headlines?
Not even the crisis in Libya could do that. Really shows the priorities of the mainstream media.:facepalm: |
:facepalm: to that...
|
What's even sadder is now the regime could feel that they are not being watched quite so closely and may feel emboldened to commit worse atrocities than they have been.
Now I live just outside Los Angeles and I heard a story about Mr. Sheen today... |
Exactly
I've thrown up my hands in disgust and stopped watching news on the television a long time ago. |
Media, has turned into a big bisness, and yes it is sad.
|
Haven't noticed Charlie Sheen being in the headlines over here in Aus, for what it's worth. So, it's not everywhere.
|
This is why I started listening to NPR and watching PBS for my news.
|
But he's a mother****ing F-16 bro!
EDIT: also, Al Jazeera is the best news source out there. |
I watch Fox news when I need a good laugh.
|
... who's Charlie Sheen?
|
I, personally, could care less about Charlie Sheen or the people affected by the tsunami.
if you feel the need to question me on why please send me a PM (to avoid getting off topic)!!! But it is sad. |
...News is news. Charlie Sheen or not, it isn't like television news is the only news out there. Watch television when you want to see what the news stations have to offer, and find other resources to find out other bits of news that you want to find out about.
It's not that hard... but for some, apparently, it is. And thus, that makes T.V. the evil bad baddies. :facepalm: to that.^ |
:facepalm:
Yeah, it's stupid, but what annoys me even more is this ridiculous scaremongering. Woodsprite, I agree, but you have to admit he has been getting far more coverage than he deserved (and I say that without even owning a TV). |
Quote:
|
Yeah, I agree but this happens often. When it is a "slow" news day, they go to the silly stories involving Charlie Sheen, et al. When more serious stuff happens, they go to that story at the expense of ignoring the other serious situations in the world (ie. the Libyan situation). Granted, the Japan earthquake/tsunami is one of the worst on record for Japan so that will get more headlines. Also, its an ongoing disaster so it will get more coverage.
|
::shrug:: The news media will report whatever they think people are interested in hearing about. Not every story will be "serious business," all the time. If you don't like hearing/reading about Charlie Sheen, then don't watch those stories or read those articles.
I'm not personally following the Charlie Sheen drama, but some people DO want to hear about it, and I don't see why my preferences should invalidate someone else's. "Newsworthiness" is a subjective quality, which is why there is a wide selection of news outlets to satisfy a wide diversity of audiences. Also, for the record, the NY Times ran waaay more headlines about Libya than about Charlie Sheen. Most would consider NY Times part of "mainstream media," seeing how it's the single most popular American online newspaper, and the third largest American print newspaper. Granted, I'm sure there are other mainstream news outlets that focus more on the "trivial" stuff. I guess my point is: I feel like "mainstream media" is too broad a group to make sweeping generalizations about their "priorities." Don't get me wrong... I agree that there's lots of weaknesses and catch-22s associated with how news reporting is done. I just don't find it very productive to shake my fist at the media for sometimes reporting stuff I don't personally find interesting. |
nothing on charlie sheen over here. i think its just america, alot of idiots over there would rather watch that sort of stuff rather than more important issues.
|
So you're saying Australian media never runs entertainment news? Interesting...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm finding myself in an odd, devil's-advocate-y sort of position... I'm actually quite critical of American media and American society in general. But I guess it feels different when it's myself or my (American) friends going "WTF, our country is so messed up; we need to do better." People from other developed countries pointing and generalizing and going "you idiot Americans" leaves a different taste in my mouth. But don't worry, I know tm20 didn't mean anything personally. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mainstream is for money and audience. Big audiences are made on these sorts of covers, conflicts, divorces and missunderstood VIPs. Same here... the earthquake stopped being an issue and the news on several divorces started to show up again ! :angry: I just don't understand how people don't get sick through time of these subjects... Oh, yes... lack of wanting "more" :airquote: :facepalm: DAANG. |
I find it sad Channel 7 (or channel 5 news i cant remember which I was watching yesterday) called Lady Gaga a "saint" because she made Japan Relief bracelets and all proceeds go to Japan Relief Efforts... I'm like what the hell, dont call gaga a saint because she does what hundreds of other people do... i was ready to throw something at the TV
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All images and clips of Avatar are the exclusive property of 20th Century Fox.