| Clarke |
08-03-2011 12:02 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Human No More
(Post 151339)
That's interesting - seemed a bit weird at the start though - I got the impression that it was an intentional attempt to confuse the reader. If not, then you might want to work on that part :)
|
Yeah, that's mostly intentional. Charlie isn't the main viewpoint character, but he gives you a better idea of how the world works, since the actual main character is a bit of a Luddite. (His chapters should be far easier to follow, since he doesn't have programs interrupting him.)
Quote:
I can't really offer advice on the writing itself, but I like it. One thing though, is "the spindly one eats the original cell" - doesn't really work in terms of cell interaction as a process - engulfs might be better.
|
Well, I was imagining it as a sort of disassembly, like this, but I know nothing about biology. (I haven't even dissected a frog. :P) I'll change it next time I revise everything.
Quote:
Also, small crypto nitpick: "addressed to your public key" - a message is encrypted with one, then it can only be decrypted with the paired private key - it isn't something most people would really notice, but if you say it's "encrypted with your public key" instead, that makes more sense - biology and computers are the two things I really know well, I'd be happy to point out any more such things on those.
|
I know this, honest. :P I think my logic was that if you know which computers/people own which public keys, then the public key also functions as an address that you can "deliver" uninterceptable messages to.
Though if you like unreliable narrators, then Charlie doesn't know you don't know how the 21.5 century Internet works, so he doesn't bother explaining it. :awesome:
:D:D:D
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyvaris
(Post 151347)
Considering Clarke and I are old internet buddies and I have read over some of his other stuff....odds are we are ALL way off.
|
I'll make sure you don't need a context dump for the next section, m'kay? :P
|