| auroraglacialis |
09-11-2010 12:01 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Human No More
(Post 93902)
I think that as far as space goes, any species that reaches that stage will be more likely to actually have 'woken up' to their problems due to the effort and coordination required...
|
Ah, yeah I know that theory. There are two theories actually. On says, that "we" have to wake up first, meaning change our political system and economy etc before space travel should be aspired and another that says that the very process of developing space travel will eventually (maybe only once successful) lead to a change in these things.
I used to think along these lines, always favouring the change first - spacetravel later apporach, but my thinking has changed a lot. And the recent advances in "private" space operations do not really give me slack there. I mean obviously the states cannot sum up the money anymore to even go to the moon. But private investors now can - so what will spacetravel be like if it is Bill Gates, BP and Monsanto that sponsor space exploration projects? You could write "RDA" instead right away :(
The sad thing is, that a competitive hierarchical society with all the pressure it puts on people is more likely to reach large goals faster and finish huge projects faster than a cooperative, egalitarian society that cares more about the people in it. Its a bit like quick and dirty instead of slow and wise. Of course, no one can know what alien societies would be like and if they would even have this kind of systems - maybe they are all like bees or all lone wolves - but these principles seem to me to not depend too much on the actual lifeform. And if they are true, then alien societies with a more opressive, competitive system are faster in reaching space travel than societies on the same planet that focus on other values.
For humans it seems to be like that - capitalism just worked faster in producing the required technologies than communism, private ventures may very well have the advantage over state run projects in the future...
"The best one wins" does not mean at all that "best" is also wise or ethical, it is in most cases simply the fastest and/or most efficient one - or the one that is best at throwing rocks at the opponents.
|