Quote:
Originally Posted by Sempu
Sometimes - often - what someone wants isn't the best thing you can do for them. Maybe a better rule is:
Treat others as their highest consciousness would like to be treated.
And then there is not only communication, but learning.
|
It's essentially the same thing. "Treat others as you would have them treat you" is inferring that the best interest of the person is always apparent, even when it may not be for the actual individual. Whether someone wants something good or bad, the good is obvious, while the bad is also obvious.
Both your arguments are unclear. You assume that if you treat the person the way you would want to be treated, that automatically means it includes everything you desire. That's not entirely true. The person you treat takes these actions negatively. No matter what the action, if the person you do the action for takes it as a negative one,
and you are aware he/she thinks of them this way, you are not following the golden rule; you are following your desires in what you would want back from them, not necessarily what they want. That's being selfish. They wouldn't want to have meat or go to a strip club, just as you wouldn't want to pray in a mosque or eat vegetables for the rest of your life.
As for the heroin argument, the best interest of the person (as I said before) is always obvious. A person may want a fix, but you, as well as society, understands that heroin leads to consequences. By being a friend, you would prevent him from taking more, which is productive and leading to a better life. You are thus doing for him what you would want done to yourself if you had a heroin addiction. Being a friend doesn't necessarily mean doing all for him that he wants. Being a friend can mean doing things for him that he may not desire, but will be thankful for in the future.