Quote:
Originally Posted by redpaintednavi
Well, sometimes we have to take action, because otherwise it can be to late before more or less corrupt politicians have reacted and dared to cross the will of capitalist enterprises or lobby groups that hold back all sort of progressive development. Extra parliamentary action is not terrorsm, instead it can be a way to protect life.
|
Yes... I've campaigned against things I oppose. I have not gone harming random people to gain publicity. That's the difference between 'extra-parliamentary action' and terrorism.
Quote:
|
And by the way, who sets the rules? Often it is corporations, lobbyists and similar with the consent of weak politicians. One can just see how matters of marine fishing have been handled lately. No politician dare to cross the fishing industry, eventhough researchers have sound the alarm for years now. Still not much happens, instead marine resources are being depleted and the only ones to try to do anything about it is environmentalists like Sea Shephard, Greenpeace and some others.
|
If you ask many people, they will have a negative opinion of these groups for their ACTIONS... they are right in terms of idea, but they are doing it completely wrongly, they will never change anything.
Really, both sides are wrong. I oppose the overhunting just as I oppose other abuses, but I also think that the people who are concerned about it have much more of an impact (and be better respected) if they worked for legitimate change.