New Post Rank System - Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls has now been upgraded to an all-new forum platform and will be temporarily located at tree-of-souls.net. This version of the forum will remain for archival reasons, but is locked for further posting. All existing accounts and posts have been moved over to the new site, so please go to tree-of-souls.net and log in with your regular credentials!
Go Back   Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum » Tree Of Souls » Suggestions

View Poll Results: Would you like to see the proposed system implemented?
Yes 32 96.97%
No 1 3.03%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old 10-28-2010, 04:04 AM
Banefull's Avatar
Banefull Banefull is offline
Ikran Makto
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 814
Send a message via Skype™ to Banefull
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Human No More View Post
I don't really see the point of lurker... doesn't really fit in. Other than that, I like it
A-F had the lurker rank (thats where I got the idea.) If you look at things from a mathematical perspective also, we ideally would want the distribution of ranks to look evenly skewed with the higher ranks having less members in general. If a rank is very high or very low beyond the trend curve, then the values may need some adjustment.

In the old system, "One of the People" held more members the rank below it. At a large value of around 60, it is highly statistically significant. This meant that reaching "Taronyu" was disproportional to the other ranks. This makes sense as 100 to 500 is a gargantuan leap compared to the gap of 25 to 100 from "seeker" to "one of the people".

Looking at the distribution graph for the new ranks, we would have 83 sky persons and 201 lurkers. If we factor out all members with 0 posts, that leaves us with 75 lurkers. The value for sky people would be rather high. This indicates that the "sky person" rank would still be disproportional to other ranks. Eliminating the "lurker" rank would further aggravate the situation by bumping up the number of "sky persons" from 83 to 158 members. If we want to smooth out the curve, then ideally we would need to have a rank at <5, 5-14, and 15-24 posts. The inclusion of an additional rank at 15 posts would split "sky person" into two ranks of around 45 and 35 members. Although not complete perfect, having a distribution of 75, 45, 35, 33 would smooth out the ranking system for newer members.

So the question is, what could fill as a rank for 15 posts? Maybe we could shift all ranks from "one of the people" down and add a higher rank also, I dunno.

There is method to my madness. I did not choose these values randomly. Speculation on how to smooth out the 1 to 25 post gap would be appreciated.

Edit: I may run some actual statistics later and calculate the residuals which would give us an indication as to whether any other ranks need to be further adjusted. A rank at 200 posts may also help (one of the people is still a tad bit high) but its not as necessary.

Last edited by Banefull; 10-28-2010 at 04:27 AM.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Visit our partner sites:

   



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:16 PM.

Based on the Planet Earth theme by Themes by Design


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All images and clips of Avatar are the exclusive property of 20th Century Fox.