![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Somehow, if something goes against any liberal/enviro-wacko idea around here, it's automatically crazy.
Let's look at some facts.What is Proposition 23? The official initiative statute is: Quote:
The bill is a useless, price-racking environmentalist attempt to receive more money from Californians, which is exactly what they don't need right now. California already has a $20 billion deficit. Prop. 23 is pretty much the solution they have to this crisis. If AB32 were to take hold, it's estimated that the average California household will pay an additional $3,800 per year in higher AB32 costs. This is, again, according to CARB. (Does Cameron look at the facts at all? )Let us remember that California has the most strict environmental laws in the U.S. already. Prop. 23 will not abate or remove the hundreds of laws that already protect the environment, reduce air pollution, etc. etc., protecting Californian health. Prop. 23 is only against AB32, which applies only to greenhouse gas emissions. CARB (again) has stated that AB32 has (quote), "no direct public health impacts." However, the statute is only a suspension on AB32 until further notice. Once unemployment is under 5.5% (as it says), the suspention will be lifted. Right now, California simply cannot afford AB32. Maybe Ah-nold and his idiot tactics as governor (which put California under staggering multi-billion-dollar debt, worse than it was in before) agrees with self-proclaimed eco-terrorist Cameron that the people of the state do not matter, but I think they do. And the California State Firefighters' Association, as well as the California Small Business Association, the National Tax Limitation Committee, and many others. Who's wearing tinfoil now?
|
|
|