![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not actually. You can keep your own interests -agreeing works by taking the others' in count too.
__________________
I love Plato, but I love Truth more - Aristotle
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If I reach an agreement with someone else, doesn't he or she now have some power over my life? I am doing part of their will insetad of mine. Last edited by Banefull; 12-16-2010 at 09:10 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's interdependence, hey; it's the minimal level of interaction between human beings; but as I said, anarchy has the plus of also working individually. So, if you want to leave, go.
__________________
I love Plato, but I love Truth more - Aristotle
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
So if anarchy is the social state in which there is no governing person or group of people, but each individual has absolute liberty, then so long as we make agreements with other human beings, there is no such thing as anarchy.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What I mean is that you can choose with whom to make bonds, with whom to share your life and with whom to collaborate. Or not at all. The case is that there are no limits but the natural ones. "Nobody commanding" means "Nobody telling me "do this, or else!"", not "Nobody speaking of making something together". That's just being asocial.
__________________
I love Plato, but I love Truth more - Aristotle
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
You already have the power to make all of these decisions. No one can truly stop you.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's called the State, and there's one in eeeevery corner of the world.
__________________
I love Plato, but I love Truth more - Aristotle
|
![]() |
|
|