![]() |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lots of debate about that subject, and '616' is based on the finding of a single broken piece of a manuscript that's under serious question, considering how there are four places in Revelation that assert the number to be indeed '666', and especially when you have people from a century before the dated document as saying the variation is erroneous (see link provided before), but that's going into a whole other discussion.
I hope I'm not evil, though. |
![]() |
|
|