|
|
#31
09-08-2010, 07:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I'm officially not worried anymore
|
|
#32
09-09-2010, 12:02 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh... I've seen that quote here before.
I just figured he meant he had the storyline for "Avatar 1" already figured out, with a few ideas thrown in for a sequel; not necessarily that he had a storyline planned out for mutliple films. At least, that's what I assumed he meant, because he kept changing his story when asked about the sequel. First it was different moons, now it's oceans. So...
|
|
#33
02-25-2011, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hmmm... Ooh! I have a thought. What if marines and a general are sent to Pandora to destroy it, with no company to hold them back and much worse weapons of mass destruction than last time, and Quaritch is among them. Then, Quaritch somehow sees why what they're doing is wrong, and HE turns on the humans and fights with Jake and rest of the Na'vi.
I think that would be COMPLETELY awesome. I don't think the public would expect Quaritch to turn GOOD. Pshugh! That would be one intense movie.
|
|
#34
02-26-2011, 01:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quaritch is dead
 The entire point of why the RDA CAN'T do that is because everyone else on Earth DOES want to avoid harming the Na'vi, as they are sentient beings. I think that having ANOTHER character who came there to destroy and then turned to the Na'vi side would be pushing the boundaries of plausibility.
__________________
...
|
|
#35
02-26-2011, 02:00 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
    Misery Forever.
|
|
#36
02-26-2011, 10:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It was just a brief movie idea that was floating around in my head. I know now that Quaritch in the sequel would be repetitive and unlikely.
|
|
#37
02-27-2011, 12:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
What I mean is this: Quaritch is dead, yes. But the RDA could have got his body and cloned him. They can make avatars, they make clone someone. They could make him mature in just a few years, like the avatars. Even though he's cloned, he won't be the same as last time because he's not living the same life. THAT'S why he'd see what's right and wrong.
But, of course, this is just some thinking. I'd expect James Cameron do something crazy like this, though.
|
|
#38
02-27-2011, 10:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
A clone wouldn't have any of his memories or personality. Indeed, if grown in a tank, it wouldn't even be able to speak English until taught. He'd need to learn (literally) everything. Either way, as I've said before, he failed, and when it comes down to it, he was disposable, someone hired to kill people and not think too hard about what he was doing, not someone to waste millions on, especially when he didn't even do his job.
__________________
...
|
|
#39
02-27-2011, 10:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quaritch wasn't hired to kill people.
|
|
#40
02-27-2011, 06:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hmmm. Now that I think about it, it's too unlikely. You must think I'm really stupid. I'm not(I hope), I just have a problem with thinking things through. I get so excited over something I don't look at the big picture.
Oh well. I guess James Cameron will start fresh and throw another villain/villains in there. I'm still up for that. 
|
|
#41
02-27-2011, 10:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#42
02-27-2011, 10:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Heh heh. Thank you.
|
|
#43
02-28-2011, 12:16 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Throwing just another sequel villian would be to predictable for Cameron
__________________
|
|
#44
02-28-2011, 03:47 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
He did it with T2.
|
|
#45
02-28-2011, 05:22 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Selfridge on the otherhand, I could imagine him switching sides (after a lot of soul searching). He seemed torn between his duties. I bet that we will see him back and that he will have a huge role to play in the sequels.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
