![]() |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't see a practicable purpose for having glowing monkeys.
__________________
Stay thirsty my friends... C V M N |
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Glowing monkeys isn't the point. It's the fact that we can place desirable traits into a species at will that's important.
__________________
:psyduck: |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Or worse, in this case... And yeah, as HNM pointed out, retroviruses, lysogenic viruses, and all other viruses are also limited in their ability to alter our DNA because they use RNA, which uses Uracil instead of Thymine for base pairs. (So instead of GTAC it's GUAC), which makes it impossible for a virus to reliably carry a specific allele for a trait over to another organism.
__________________
Modern technology owes ecology an apology. Trouble keeps me running faster Save the planet from disaster... |
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, human genes can end up in bacteria for example:
Opportunity and Means: Horizontal Gene Transfer from the Human Host to a Bacterial Pathogen And from viruses they can end up in humans and passed on to offspring: Genes from Chagas parasite can transfer to humans and be passed on to children : Not Exactly Rocket Science Quote:
PLoS ONE: Inheritance of DNA Transferred from American Trypanosomes to Human Hosts Quote:
Another study for example found lactose tolerance in the Hadza who never drink milk or keep cows but are purely hunter-gatherers. One theory is that they got that genes from HGT. But this is getting off topic
__________________
Know your idols: Who said "Hitler killed five million Jews. It is the greatest crime of our time. But the Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher's knife. They should have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs.". (Solution: "Mahatma" Ghandi) Stop terraforming Earth (wordpress) "Humans are storytellers. These stories then can become our reality. Only when we loose ourselves in the stories they have the power to control us. Our culture got lost in the wrong story, a story of death and defeat, of opression and control, of separation and competition. We need a new story!" |
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
Genetic drift happens in all species anyway - if a species was capable of reliably (emphasis on reliably) transferring DNA and that caused it to be expressed, then the risk would be far higher in modification of already existing sequences, as well as the fact that the vast majority of DNA is essentially junk, and does not code for anything (this is how genetic profiles used for identification of individuals from DNA samples are created). The 'risk' would most likely involve some slight change to those regions, which are different for every being thanks to mutation and crossing over of chromosomes.
As for equality of opportunity and that improvements should be available to all who seek them, that is an important point which I agree on, and economic reform is an important point, but what is equally important is a change in perception of what is important on an individual basis.
__________________
... |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Okay, that was really interesting, although it was actually based off of a much more correct and thorough research journal. And, again, like others have pointed out, even if some unusually frequent horizontal transfer is occurring, it hasn't done much to change us. The lactose intolerance thing was already known, and beyond that, there isn't much that can change us dramatically enough through horizontal transfer that we would look, live, or act terribly differently. If someone really wanted to get blue skin, a tail, insect wings, scales, gills or whatever crazy things they want to try and genetically engineer, even if they are miraculously successful, it would take large numbers of microorganisms, coordinated perfectly, to take the entire gene and give it to someone in just the right way to have them actually start displaying the phenotypes that the gene codes for. There is no animal that can do this right now. The protist in the journal article is doing something pretty unique, but it isn't giving people red eyes or blue hair, or even something easy to reproduce like cancer genes. It's even tied to an intermediate host; a clever but rather delicate Hemipteran insect, which doesn't bite specific people, only whoever is presenting an opportunity for a meal. The parasite is mostly passing genes around that code for genetic garbage and wind up being inactive anyway. .
__________________
Modern technology owes ecology an apology. Trouble keeps me running faster Save the planet from disaster... |
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
Exactly.
Humans carry a huge amount of genetic data that is not visible even other than in non-coding regions as I previously mentioned - atavism is a common example of this and is not particularly rare - it is not caused by transfer of genetic material, but by certain combinations, by mutation and by chance. Humans still contain DNA for a tail, but humans do not have them. That is part of the reason that genetic engineering is not as simple as 'isolate sequence foo and insert it anywhere into the DNA of any target cell'
__________________
... |
![]() |
|
|