Which people is most like the Na vi? - Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls has now been upgraded to an all-new forum platform and will be temporarily located at tree-of-souls.net. This version of the forum will remain for archival reasons, but is locked for further posting. All existing accounts and posts have been moved over to the new site, so please go to tree-of-souls.net and log in with your regular credentials!
Go Back   Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum » General Forums » General Discussion
FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27  
Old 04-20-2011, 11:37 PM
Banefull's Avatar
Banefull Banefull is offline
Ikran Makto
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 814
Send a message via Skype™ to Banefull
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Human No More View Post
Genetic algorithms (a form of machine intelligence capable of improving on previous results) have existed (in theory, if not in implementation) for decades and are biologically inspired (not used as an analogy). The same goes for a neural network - biological inspiration is becoming a lot more common for advanced technology due to the way it combines relative simplicity with being highly adapted. I don't think anyone (with a significant understanding of either or both) ever honestly considered a telephone exchange similar to a neural network - they used it as an analogy to explain the latter, certainly, but analogies do vary in quality, as well as by time. The truth is that the animal neural network and microprocessors are each best at almost the exact opposite operations (pattern recognition vs binary arithmetic and logical operators), and inspiration from biological systems is often used in developing systems that can have similar potential capabilities.
Out of curiosity then, do you think that humans have free will? Or are we merely slaves to the pattern input we receive our senses?

A computer is slave to its input. You can trace the series of processes that lead up to the output. Even a program that modifies itself from runtime to runtime is still subject to its initial input in the original program.

I have never been fully convinced that logic is the final frontier in all things. That doesn't mean that I don't think its wrong or correct but rather it might be missing a few things that out there that lie outside its domain or scope. I myself have always wondered why we as beings exist seemingly in control of a body and not just some mass of complex organic cells that act out and simulate everything in our lives based upon automatic pattern recognition from senses and preprogrammed genetic responses and tendencies. This "knowledge" or "ability" that indigenous people could very well exist.

Last edited by Banefull; 04-20-2011 at 11:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Visit our partner sites:

   



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:51 AM.

Based on the Planet Earth theme by Themes by Design


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All images and clips of Avatar are the exclusive property of 20th Century Fox.