Which people is most like the Na vi? - Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls has now been upgraded to an all-new forum platform and will be temporarily located at tree-of-souls.net. This version of the forum will remain for archival reasons, but is locked for further posting. All existing accounts and posts have been moved over to the new site, so please go to tree-of-souls.net and log in with your regular credentials!
Go Back   Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum » General Forums » General Discussion
FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30  
Old 04-22-2011, 02:47 AM
Human No More's Avatar
Human No More Human No More is offline
Toruk Makto, Admin
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In a datacentre
Posts: 11,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sempu View Post
I didn't mean that people compared telephone exchanges to neural networks. I meant that back when a telephone exchange was the hottest new technology, people compared the human brain to them.
Incorrectly, then. More likely was that people compared them to the brain - although honestly, there is extremely little common ground in their operation, but far less was known about the nervous system back then.
Trust me, I have studied AI, knowledge systems and genetic algorithms as well as biology.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Banefull View Post
Out of curiosity then, do you think that humans have free will? Or are we merely slaves to the pattern input we receive our senses?
Free will, clearly. There are chances taken every millisecond, things that work out randomly, from whether someone decides to go out or not to which parts of a chromosome cross over during meiosis, potentially completely changing the biological characteristics of a person. Humans (and all animals) make their own decisions, and basic physical processes are always applied consistently.

Quote:
A computer is slave to its input. You can trace the series of processes that lead up to the output. Even a program that modifies itself from runtime to runtime is still subject to its initial input in the original program.
Not always. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_game_of_life. It's a series of patterns that evolve without input other than the initial state, but follow definable mathematical rules, and it is by no means a unique example. The underlying code was obviously written by a human, but the results are generated completely procedurally.

The entire point of advanced machine learning systems is to have only a basic framework, to start from no assumptions and build up to the required system. Most will use a domain of facts which are generally input manually, but this is by no means the only (or best) approach.

Quote:
I myself have always wondered why we as beings exist seemingly in control of a body and not just some mass of complex organic cells that act out and simulate everything in our lives based upon automatic pattern recognition from senses and preprogrammed genetic responses and tendencies. This "knowledge" or "ability" that indigenous people could very well exist.
Every single action and response can be mapped. There is very little that is not fully understood, and the theory is understood. Every single (reputable, methodologically correct, published and peer reviewed) study investigating any kind of paranormal capabilities of humans has soundly debunked those claims.
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Visit our partner sites:

   



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:51 AM.

Based on the Planet Earth theme by Themes by Design


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All images and clips of Avatar are the exclusive property of 20th Century Fox.