Minor News tidbit from the Twitter-space....

[Drewan]

James Cameron Says His ‘Avatar’ Sequels Are Not A Trilogy---Hmmmm???

James Cameron Says His ‘Avatar’ Sequels Are Not A Trilogy | /Film

[Moco Loco]

Wat, wat? Well, sequels was still plural. Hmm.

THERE MUST BE FOUR OF THEM.

[Drewan]

Let's see---Arc for Jake....Arc for.........I would count At Least 6!!!!!!!

Come on James!!!!!! Do It!!!!!!

[misstammie]

Originally Posted by Drewan

James Cameron Says His ‘Avatar’ Sequels Are Not A Trilogy---Hmmmm???

James Cameron Says His ‘Avatar’ Sequels Are Not A Trilogy | /Film

Kaltxi my Drewan! WOW...great article. I was under the interperation he was doing a "trilogy" but that's doesn't bother me at all. I am just tickled "blue" he is doing the sequels regardless. I think I like the idea he is with going with in his writings of the scripts and going with more of a "character arc" in his storytelling. That should be very interesting and after all it wasn't only Pandora that made us fall in love with Avatar but the characters themselves.

Also, I like what he looking into as far as the technology aspect. That will be very intriguing to see what envelopes he will push this time around. Thanks so much for sharing this ma tsmukan.

[Icu]

Some of you guys should have read the rest of the article....

Nothing has changed There are still going to be three movies. I guess his point was to emphasize that it's not one big story with arbitrary lines drawn to make it into three parts (LOTR) but three stories tied together by the characters/setting etc.

[tawtute_tsamsiyu]

Originally Posted by Icu

You guys should have read the rest of the article....

Nothing has changed There are still going to be three movies. I guess his point was to emphasize that it's not one big story with arbitrary lines drawn to make it into three parts (LOTR) but three stories tied together by the characters/setting etc.

Confuse.

EDIT: Mind explaining it a bit?

[Empty Glass]

Hmm, I'm guessing what James Cameron means is that the movies are meant to really be able to stand apart from each other. I have heard this before regarding the sequels, but maybe the amount of "stand-apart-ness" is going to be greater than previously thought.

I don't know if I just made it clearer or more confusing.

[tawtute_tsamsiyu]

So, it's still following the same people and setting, but not right where the previous one had left off?

[iron_jones]

A billion sequels!!

[electrosphere11]

Originally Posted by tawtute_tsamsiyu

So, it's still following the same people and setting, but not right where the previous one had left off?

no, It will most likely be set some time after the events of the first. Years possibly.

[tawtute_tsamsiyu]

Originally Posted by electrosphere11

no, It will most likely be set some time after the events of the first. Years possibly.

Exactly. It will still follow Jake, Neyney, etc., but not right after Avatar ends. I think I'm getting this now.

[GhostTiger]

Oooh. Interesting. I'm so curious, but I'm so glad he's taking such care to work out the story.

[Raiden]

Originally Posted by Moco Loco

Wat, wat? Well, sequels was still plural. Hmm.

THERE MUST BE FOUR OF THEM.

Bahahaha

Wow, this is cool.

Maybe it'll wind up being like Star Wars?

EDIT:

**reads Icu's post**

Nevermind.... :[

[Moco Loco]

Originally Posted by Icu

Some of you guys should have read the rest of the article....

Nothing has changed There are still going to be three movies. I guess his point was to emphasize that it's not one big story with arbitrary lines drawn to make it into three parts (LOTR) but three stories tied together by the characters/setting etc.

I was just joking dude

[Alan]

'Ere, when ever I have spoken to or listend to people about the squels, it's always about when the Humans come back etc.

Well, if the follow on films are not linked to the first one, well then what's to say that there is no human return at all and the 'antaganist' is actually on Pandora or one of the other moons....hmmmm...

Ok time for bed. Txon lefpom

Alan