Spirituality is right. The world is unknowable. So? - Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls has now been upgraded to an all-new forum platform and will be temporarily located at tree-of-souls.net. This version of the forum will remain for archival reasons, but is locked for further posting. All existing accounts and posts have been moved over to the new site, so please go to tree-of-souls.net and log in with your regular credentials!
Go Back   Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum » General Forums » General Discussion
FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old 09-09-2011, 06:37 PM
Clarke's Avatar
Clarke Clarke is offline
Karyu
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Scotland, 140 years too early
Posts: 1,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsyal Makto View Post
There are mystical or unexplainable elements to everything, what's your point?
Even logic? Even mathematics?

Quote:
Originally Posted by auroraglacialis View Post
Science is not wrong - within its realm...
Where does its realm end? Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by auroraglacialis View Post
Science claims truth and denies religious, spiritual or even holistic philosophical thought that truth and bascially puts them in the corner of the fool. It calls them liars, superstitious nonsense and self-deluding idiocy.
Really? I didn't know science delivered emotional conclusions.

Quote:
I think at least there is one (probably many more) other way to look at it
Of course there are, but the point of this thread is the question: What do those other ways tell you which is useful?

Quote:
The only way out of this mechanistic dilemma of utter darkness and the allowance of all behaviour is to create a construct of an enlightened human.
You appear to think that emotions are necessary for the world to function. Why? Also, this appears to be an argument to consequences. Could you elaborate on why it isn't?

Quote:
Looking at it the other way round - that for us as living beings what is primary is our experiences, our emotions, our consciousness and that the physical world is basically the means we are existing seems to me much more fulfilling. We can still marvel at the things science tells us, but we are not slaves to the notion of being basically just walking vehicles for competitive gene transfer.
I don't understand why this idea is mutually exclusive to the one garnered from science. Science tells you how the world physically works, it doesn't give any sort of accompanying values. At least, it doesn't at the moment; you would probably win a Nobel Prize if you could get it to.

EDIT: Correction: science doesn't give you values without you already knowing what it is you want to achieve. It can only tell you what's good and evil when you know, precisly, what "good" and "evil" mean. (The vast majority of people don't know in enough detail.)
__________________

Last edited by Clarke; 09-09-2011 at 06:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Visit our partner sites:

   



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:33 AM.

Based on the Planet Earth theme by Themes by Design


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All images and clips of Avatar are the exclusive property of 20th Century Fox.