![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I still like my, it was a result of a highly advanced biotech the Na'vi had and then lost/gave up/evolved out of and into a better/more peaceful life style.
__________________
Sweet is the lore which Nature brings; Our meddling intellect Mis-shapes the beauteous forms of things: We murder to dissect. Enough of Science and of Art; Close up those barren leaves; Come forth, and bring with you a heart That watches and receives. William Wordsworth
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It does not have to be about sexual intercourse. There is more to sex than that. A lot of biological properties are because of that. Or do you think that a stag will penetrate his mate with the antlers or a peacock spreads his genes with his colorful feathers? Quote:
I just think that it makes evolutionary sense that this way of connecting originates from a more close connection that a mother and her offspring have. After all, the offspring is a part of her body, that grows and eventually is separated - it makes sense, I think, that re-establishing a connection between these two beings that once were more or less one (of course there are limits to that - DNA is different, but a lot is shared - nutrients, blood,...) makes a lot of sense as a evolutionary strategy. As I said - the analogy in terms of nutrients are the development of mothers milk - in that sense, connecting to a direhorse would be the equivalent to drinking cows milk. Quote:
Quote:
)
__________________
Know your idols: Who said "Hitler killed five million Jews. It is the greatest crime of our time. But the Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher's knife. They should have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs.". (Solution: "Mahatma" Ghandi) Stop terraforming Earth (wordpress) "Humans are storytellers. These stories then can become our reality. Only when we loose ourselves in the stories they have the power to control us. Our culture got lost in the wrong story, a story of death and defeat, of opression and control, of separation and competition. We need a new story!" |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I highly doubt that could occur through convergence if they really are trees, "will" of Eywa or not.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
While attraction is obviously a factor in sex, it isn't actually a part of the physical process past the concept of getting participants into a willing and ready state. Quote:
Quote:
I think that the queue does provide a different evolutionary advantage in terms of within the Na'vi though in that it allows mated pairs to have a strong emotional connection that is likely part physical too, on a neurochemical level, which would make it far less likely for them to even allow the other to come to harm, and to remain in a mated pair, perhaps care for offspring, although even that is ancillary to the fact that one without the ability would be heavily constrained in being unable to perform so many normal activities, potentially have problems mating with another. Quote:
![]() It's likely transfer on a neurochemical level - more of the exact information as stored physically than a reinterpretation/being copied in, even if the recipient is then able to do so from their own experience of the information. As I said, it's not routine simple memory transfer that might be used in a parent/child context; that was my entire point there. In any case, if it is intimate, then that's something against 'within family', not that I follow that line of reasoning any more than the fact hat such a sharing with any sentient being would have a degree of what could easily be considered intimacy, while not so with a nonsentient one due to differences in thought processes, formations, and the role of instinct. Quote:
It's a question of how far sentience goes - I would say that such fine manipulation is completely infeasible, it would be much the same as a human adjusting their DNA (and having to do so via means such as retrovirus) to make a permanent change (and without any of the thousands of theoretical or extreme early-stage technologies that would be required). There's just no real mechanism for such fine control without a truly prodigious mutation rate, a far faster environmental reaction to selective pressures (and some means of controlling that and ensuring it creates the desired response rather than, for example, extinction, or changes in the wrong species) and unprecedented error checking and generation shortness. That's why it seems implausible compared to such an ability reaching far further into a shared genetic history, where it would have proved a massive competitive and thus selective benefit against other non-sensitive life in single-cell, multicellular microscopic or protozoan forms. Agreed. It just doesn't fit in - convergence doesn't produce compatibility on such a scale, only vague similarities in form, particularly in regards to extreme environmental conditions. Same body layout between humans and Na'vi is plausible, parallel development of wings in various species even more so, but biological compatibility between relatively unrelated species? (in terms of a divergence point being distant) Not so much.
__________________
... |
![]() |
|
|