Hot Tea Or Cold Tea? - Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls has now been upgraded to an all-new forum platform and will be temporarily located at tree-of-souls.net. This version of the forum will remain for archival reasons, but is locked for further posting. All existing accounts and posts have been moved over to the new site, so please go to tree-of-souls.net and log in with your regular credentials!
Go Back   Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum » General Forums » Debate
FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 04-13-2010, 05:53 PM
Sovereign's Avatar
Sovereign Sovereign is offline
Sig-Making Guy
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 335
Send a message via AIM to Sovereign
Default Hot Tea Or Cold Tea?

Some people say the "Tea Party" is nothing but a bunch of genteel people with "new" ideas about how the country should be run. Others think it is getting completely out of hand, a la this.

While what they're doing is legal as far as I can tell, their logic is contorted at best. George W. Bush's policies continue to this day in the form of warrant-less wiretapping, FISA court bypasses, extraordinary rendition and "the War on Terrorism" in general. Somehow, these people seem to be more riled up by a health-care bill than anything else.

I just see this as extraordinarily hypocritical. Where were they when the PATRIOT ACT passed? The federal government could demand to see, for example, what books you were checking out of the library (on the grounds that they might find potential lone-wolf terrorists through their reading habits) and your librarian couldn't even say whether the feds had been by or not. In other words, you cannot contest the surveillance, lawful or not, because you cannot prove it happened. I feel like that is far more invasive than any health-care bill.

As long as they just parade around like five-year-olds playing army I don't care--they're within their rights (if a bit creepy to me). But as soon as they incite violence or harm someone, God help them when the real Army comes in and kicks their butts with all that expensive war material we've been buying.

If it makes them feel "safer," fine, but if the implication is that the government needs to be removed through force, that's a whole other story. I find it interesting that there has been a large (at least in terms of reports) uptick in "anti-government" and "gov needs to go" rhetoric now, as opposed to earlier, and that many of these people complain Obama hasn't ended some of Bush's policies. Policies are, just like the institutions they represent, hard to change. Sometimes, they might be useful as distasteful as they sound, hence the administration keeps them on hand (I think Karl Rove said something to that effect).

We have elections. Use them. If anyone out there is going to contend that the situation is so extraordinary that we need to not only remove the politicians but be ready to physically resist something they can't even put into words beyond vague rhetoric, then I'd love to hear the justification.
__________________

(Click image to give me Tsahaylu! -- Tsahaylu Count: 127)

Last edited by Sovereign; 04-13-2010 at 06:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Visit our partner sites:

   



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:13 AM.

Based on the Planet Earth theme by Themes by Design


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All images and clips of Avatar are the exclusive property of 20th Century Fox.