How To Make Earth's Population Sustainable? - Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls has now been upgraded to an all-new forum platform and will be temporarily located at tree-of-souls.net. This version of the forum will remain for archival reasons, but is locked for further posting. All existing accounts and posts have been moved over to the new site, so please go to tree-of-souls.net and log in with your regular credentials!
Go Back   Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum » General Forums » Environmentalism
FAQ Community Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old 04-29-2010, 04:57 PM
PunkMaister PunkMaister is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ponce, Puerto Rico
Posts: 306
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by auroraglacialis View Post
I agree with Spock, also in that I do not have the energy to make long posts on this.
Just a few remarks:
* Before you talk about communism or socialism, you should find out what that really means. The basics of the theory. Not the so-called socialist nations that never really have been true communist or socialist states at all! Also, socialism does not have to mean that everything is owned by the state, but that everything, all resources and production is there to serve all people. The ways to achieve this are manyfold.
* The liebig limit. It should suffice to say two things - one is, we do not want to hit that limit. Yes, population will control itself to its limits, but no it wont be pretty. What makes it worse is, that we are facing actually a decline of that limit rather than hitting it from below, we will find ourselves suddenly above it, worsening the effects. We have two choices - voluntary reduction (my preferred method is also socialism and education, but I would not oppose a two-child policy to keep at least ZPG); Or involuntary reduction by random means. Now whcih of these could be more "humane" - hmmmm
* increasing the planets capacity. It is possible in some ways. Especially with enough energy. Desalinated water, Skyscraper farming and using modern farming technologies in some additional areas can increase output. The problem is, that more production never solved the matter of overpopulation. Each time humans devised better food production, population increased (Liebigs law) until all that benefit went to hell. And many of the modern aspects of increasing output are either harming the planet and ourselves or are not sustaineable in the long run (making the problem of living above the Liebig limit even worse)
* Eating less meat - same as before. temporary solution only. Eventually we would, like in "Avatar", all eat plant derived protein slurry and be able to sustain twice as much population but still be on the brink.

For those in this thread who think, that growth is not a problem and can be handled, maybe even by colonizing space, please invest half an hour or so into education and listen to a lecture from a mathematics professor at the University of Boulder who can explain the dynamics of growth. It is not a boring math lecture, I promise, it is very well done and obviously focuses mainly on the topic of this thread and the predicament on what solutions we could choose: YouTube - The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See (part 1 of 8) (part 1 of 8)


Other than that all I can say is :


and:

(translation: No, No, this is not communism; referring to the three self imposed communist leaders despite the fact that the mere concept of communism does exclude such a permanent position)

Oh and if you can understand German: this is a great one-page comic on the neverending discussion on communism.

1. No one here is saying that population growth is not a problem, but there a lot of misconceptions about this too. For example when Scientists said that we are above the carrying capacity what they really meant to say is that if every human being in the planet where to live as the people in the U.S and the developed world does you would need not one or 2 but 3 Earth like planets, hence the carrying capacity argument. Hope that clears the whole thing up.

2. I've always argued that education is the best way to solve the overpopulation problem that now afflicts the third world particularly Africa.

3. No matter how you want to paint it, Socialism and Communism are by far and wide failed social experiments. Maybe instead of trying to rehash them they should try to take what has worked from such models such as Cooperatives for example. and dump all from that system which has not worked and never will.

I'm going to finish by saying that responsible resource management and population management by education and voluntary means should not only be implemented in Earth but wherever we go next in the Cosmos. After all the same principles would apply on any off-world Solar system colonies or interstellar colonies.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Visit our partner sites:

   



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:32 AM.

Based on the Planet Earth theme by Themes by Design


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All images and clips of Avatar are the exclusive property of 20th Century Fox.