Malice

[ZenitYerkes]

You see, this is one of the most upsetting things that somebody can show me on a debate. Not that people can do something in their own benefit and incidentally hurt the others, but malice is about harming without making any good to you.

I've posted an overpopulation topic on the AF Debate zone, and suddenly Spock turned up trying to prove me wrong. You'd say that it's the most common thing on debates; but it was a destructive critique. See, instead of giving his point of view, he just went around attacking.

Is that a way to find solutions, or just a tool to feel superior over someone saying "I'm right, you're wrong because you can't answer this"?

Sorry for making a whole thread about this, but it really upsets me and wanted to see if there's people who feel the same as I do.

"Never attack if there's no advantage in it" The art of War, by Sun Tzu