![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
No, live cute, puppies.
The humane thing would be to leave them be or pet them. Inhumane would be lighting them on fire for lols.
__________________
:psyduck: |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, and nazism has its advantages too.
There are always some positive aspects of everything. It doesn't mean that the whole thing is something good.
__________________
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Positive effects of lighting puppies on fire?
(Eltu, Nazism was nationalism paired with genocidal persecution) Nationalisms good, but Nazism is defined by the genocidal bit, may want to rethink that.
__________________
:psyduck: |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Concerning nazism: Yes, it is defined by the genocidal bit, but it still keeps the good parts of nationalism. It doesn't mean it is good as a whole.
And no, I meant positive parts of being "humane".
__________________
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Humane is a simple question.
"Would I do this to a member of my own countrymen/species?"
__________________
:psyduck: |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Exactly. And I don't like humans.
__________________
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
So...
You don't like the only species that really gives any **** whether you live or die? : /
__________________
:psyduck: |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
That is a matter of another debate, really. One I'd be delighted to have.
![]() But not in this thread - it's gone offtopic enough already.
__________________
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
some humans dont give a **** whether you live or die. if an animal wants to kill you, its because it needs food or feels threatened, not because it gets a thrill from it
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Original topic, guys, adhere to it
__________________
'I have already chosen. But this woman must also choose me' 'She already has' ![]() 'Mawey! Na'viyä, mawey!' |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Eltu started it.
__________________
:psyduck: |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
He should've known better
__________________
'I have already chosen. But this woman must also choose me' 'She already has' ![]() 'Mawey! Na'viyä, mawey!' |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
The original poster actively took part in the offtopic discussion, thus, I deemed it passable.
__________________
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Original topic response:
If I had to chose a realistic goal (on that doesn't depend on alternate realities, universes, dimensions etc.) then I would go into space. Before I get the whole "humans in space = bad", it would still be realistic to cause a bit of reform in the space administrations first. For example, advocating for space junk cleanup, international cooperation, and non-militarization of space, and then going into space to work on the implementation of those very worthy causes. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
+1 Internet for Sight Unseen
Space is a worthy goal, but if I were to do it, I'd want to be in the Star Trek era of time, where there are ships and warp etc. Not all this rockets business
__________________
'I have already chosen. But this woman must also choose me' 'She already has' ![]() 'Mawey! Na'viyä, mawey!' |
![]() |
| Tags |
| life goals |
|
|