Two Billion? - Page 3 - Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum
Tree of Souls has now been upgraded to an all-new forum platform and will be temporarily located at tree-of-souls.net. This version of the forum will remain for archival reasons, but is locked for further posting. All existing accounts and posts have been moved over to the new site, so please go to tree-of-souls.net and log in with your regular credentials!
Go Back   Tree of Souls - An Avatar Community Forum » General Forums » Debate
FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2010, 06:52 AM
Elyannia's Avatar
Elyannia Elyannia is offline
Tsulfätu
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenitYerkes View Post
The problem is not actually the people but the demand they produce.

If we didn't eat this much, if we didn't take so much: there wouldn't be any overpopulation problem.
I have to agree with this. People don't think about portion sizes when they should be. Sure you can't go out and measure how much to eat, but I think we as people should be more aware of how much, mostly Americans,we over eat.
__________________

"We were given: Two hands to hold. To legs to walk. Two eyes to see. Two ears to listen. But why only one heart? Because the other was given to someone else. For us to find."

"Gandhi said that whatever you do in life will be insignificant, but it's very important that you do it because nobody else will. Like when someone comes into your life and half of you says: 'You're nowhere near ready'. And the other half says: 'Make her yours forever'."-Remember Me

"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind"-Mahatma Gandhi

"It can't rain all the time"-The Crow
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-2010, 12:50 AM
caveman's Avatar
caveman caveman is offline
Tsamsiyu
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Heart
Posts: 645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elyannia View Post
I have to agree with this. People don't think about portion sizes when they should be. Sure you can't go out and measure how much to eat, but I think we as people should be more aware of how much, mostly Americans,we over eat.
Eating may not be as big as a problem as overall consumption. I don't know for sure, but I think the main causes are materialism and energy demands.

Again, I the number of people we have is secondary to how much we consume. Like you said, we need to be more aware of our impacts in daily life. I believe if there is going to be a solution, it will come from the people, not a legislature. A new social paradigm needs to begin from society itself. One where people find for themselves that they can't buy their worth and instead, find satisfaction knowing they are leaving this world better then they found it.
__________________
Stay thirsty my friends...
C V M N
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2010, 06:40 AM
Layzie's Avatar
Layzie Layzie is offline
Taronyu
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: WI, United States
Posts: 498
Default

Can somebody confirm this for me?

I heard that in one of the countries in Asia, I think it might be China, you're only allowed to have a certain amount of children because of the population.

Does anybody know anything about this?
__________________


Man On The Moon II: The Legend Of Mr. Rager
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2010, 07:50 AM
Woodsprite's Avatar
Woodsprite Woodsprite is offline
Olo'eyktan
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 3,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Layzie View Post
Can somebody confirm this for me?

I heard that in one of the countries in Asia, I think it might be China, you're only allowed to have a certain amount of children because of the population.

Does anybody know anything about this?
Yes, in China there's a one-child-per-family law, where any child conceived after the firstborn is required by law to be aborted, no questions asked.

I can't count the number of news articles or films I've seen that have a negative outlook on this law. It's inhuman, and I think anyone who supports even the notion that such a law be held over the population of the world should get some serious therapy.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2010, 10:29 AM
redpaintednavi redpaintednavi is offline
Taronyu
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 471
Default

One can just ask oneself what is the alternative in a country like China who was on the verge of collapsing from its own demographic pressure? What is the alternative for India if the population will continue to rise (already now Indians are colonizing other peoples land and drown them in a flood of people as can be seen on the Andaman islands, where the invading Indians have increased in numbers from 25 000 in 1950 to more than 300 000 today, while the aboriginal Andaman population has decreased from around 10 000 to 1000)?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-05-2010, 10:40 AM
Woodsprite's Avatar
Woodsprite Woodsprite is offline
Olo'eyktan
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 3,184
Default

China isn't on the verge of collapsing demographically. The only thing "overpopulated" about China are its large cities where the population tends to converge. The other problem is its Communist nature, where the government has a controlled price range over regular worker pay, in that people are willing to make some form of money even if they work for 15 cents an hour.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-05-2010, 11:25 AM
redpaintednavi redpaintednavi is offline
Taronyu
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 471
Default

One problem with China concerning demography is that it is indeed a huge country but that not all of its area are good for agriculture, much of it is rather barren, mountains, rocks and deserts. So it is just a part of the country that really has the capacity to produce food to its population. So too much people could have ended in a catastrophe, especially since Chinas agricultural technique had its flaws at the time the regime implemented the one child policy. Today there is actually serious discussions in abandoning that policy, or modify it.

Last edited by redpaintednavi; 10-06-2010 at 11:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-06-2010, 01:49 AM
Tsyal Makto's Avatar
Tsyal Makto Tsyal Makto is offline
Tsulfätu
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Body - Chicago, Spirit - Pandora
Posts: 1,868
Default

I think number of people, and how much they consume are equally important. We're going to reach a point someday where no matter how much we curb our consumption, or how many techno-fixes we implement, where we will no longer be able to advance as a species while still attempting to grow our population. Sure, we can concentrate populations in cities, but those cities will still require electricity, and water, and other infrastructure that inevitably strain the planet's resources.
__________________


The Dreamer's Manifesto

Mike Malloy, a voice of reason in a world gone mad.

"You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling." - Inception

"Man, I see in fight club the strongest and smartest men who've ever lived. I see all this potential, and I see squandering. God damn it, an entire generation pumping gas, waiting tables; slaves with white collars. Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy **** we don't need. We're the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War's a spiritual war... our Great Depression is our lives. We've all been raised on television to believe that one day we'd all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off." - Tyler Durden
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-06-2010, 02:06 AM
Human No More's Avatar
Human No More Human No More is offline
Toruk Makto, Admin
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In a datacentre
Posts: 11,726
Default

EXACTLY.
There is a whole generation of people who don't realise that everything comes from somewhere. Food doesn't just spawn on the shelves in Tescos, energy comes from somewhere, as do petrol, metal, even wood.
THAT is why population isn't limited by how high you can vertically stack people, because you'll run out of resources to SUPPORT that population.
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-06-2010, 03:23 AM
Tsyal Makto's Avatar
Tsyal Makto Tsyal Makto is offline
Tsulfätu
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Body - Chicago, Spirit - Pandora
Posts: 1,868
Default

Ok, new question. We're looking for ways to accomodate the population now, but how do we make the move towards reducing the population in the long run? How do we break this taboo about it? The mainstream media paints populationism as akin to eugenics, how do we fight this misconception?
__________________


The Dreamer's Manifesto

Mike Malloy, a voice of reason in a world gone mad.

"You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling." - Inception

"Man, I see in fight club the strongest and smartest men who've ever lived. I see all this potential, and I see squandering. God damn it, an entire generation pumping gas, waiting tables; slaves with white collars. Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy **** we don't need. We're the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War's a spiritual war... our Great Depression is our lives. We've all been raised on television to believe that one day we'd all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off." - Tyler Durden

Last edited by Tsyal Makto; 10-06-2010 at 03:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-06-2010, 03:28 AM
Advent's Avatar
Advent Advent is offline
Mother Falcon
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Somewhere home
Posts: 2,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsyal Makto View Post
Ok, new question. We're looking for ways to accomodate the population now, but how do we make the move towards reducing the population in the long run?
As I said, limit the amount of children. That, or greatly encourage the use of contraception.

It's either that, or we wait a couple centuries when we die of starvation or war.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-06-2010, 03:37 AM
Banefull's Avatar
Banefull Banefull is offline
Ikran Makto
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 814
Send a message via Skype™ to Banefull
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsyal Makto View Post
Ok, new question. We're looking for ways to accomodate the population now, but how do we make the move towards reducing the population in the long run? How do we break this taboo about it? The mainstream media paints populationism as akin to eugenics, how do we fight this misconception?
Is there even a need to reduce the population? The world isn't going to collapse because there are just 9 billion people. It can be done in a good sustainable manner. Technology is ever accelerating while population growth is slowing. We will find more efficient ways of doing things and new solutions to our problems with the passage time.

That being said we shouldn't let the status quo stand. We have to reduce our consumption in simple ways like recycling more often, buying less unnecessary items, and encouraging companies to go green buy buying greener products. As consumers we vote with our money and determine the direction of the markets.

Last edited by Banefull; 10-06-2010 at 03:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-06-2010, 12:12 PM
caveman's Avatar
caveman caveman is offline
Tsamsiyu
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Heart
Posts: 645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tsyal Makto View Post
Ok, new question. We're looking for ways to accomodate the population now, but how do we make the move towards reducing the population in the long run? How do we break this taboo about it? The mainstream media paints populationism as akin to eugenics, how do we fight this misconception?
How could we reduce the population for the long run? Do nothing. The population is naturally peaking, and will top at 9.2 Billion in 50-60 years. That many people isn't a problem. Giving them the amount of stuff the average American consumes is a problem. So if you're going to fight any misconception, let it be this: More stuff is better.
__________________
Stay thirsty my friends...
C V M N
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-06-2010, 03:24 AM
Banefull's Avatar
Banefull Banefull is offline
Ikran Makto
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 814
Send a message via Skype™ to Banefull
Default

We are NOT in any danger of a food crisis anytime soon. We currently grow more than enough food to properly feed everyone 2000 calories. Unfortunately, however, with the way the economy works, most of the food isn't allocated to everyone who needs it. We only utilize a very small portion of our total capacity to grow food. We could feed a population of 20 billion if the need arose but satisfying other demands for luxuries or energy is a whole different matter. The Earth can feed everyone but if the entire Earth's population consumed nonessential products and energy like the average inhabitant of the developed world, then the ecosystem would utterly collapse.

Last edited by Banefull; 10-06-2010 at 03:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-06-2010, 03:30 AM
Tsyal Makto's Avatar
Tsyal Makto Tsyal Makto is offline
Tsulfätu
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Body - Chicago, Spirit - Pandora
Posts: 1,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Banefull View Post
We are NOT in any danger of a food crisis anytime soon. We currently grow more than enough food to properly feed everyone 2000 calories. Unfortunately, however, with the way the economy works, most of the food isn't allocated to everyone who needs it. We only utilize a very small portion of our total capacity to grow food. We could feed a population of 20 billion if the need arose but satisfying other demands for luxuries or energy is a whole different matter. The Earth can feed everyone but if the entire Earth's population consumed nonessential products and energy like the average inhabitant of the developed world, then the ecosystem would utterly collapse.
I don't know how much of the developed world would be willing to give up those luxuries, though. Most people have developed urges beyond the basics of food and water. You'd be hard pressed to get them to give up those things, just for the sake of allowing a larger population to inhabit the planet.

If they had to choose between: A)supporting a smaller population, while keeping luxuries, or B) going with less, to allow more people to inhabit the planet, I'm pretty sure most would choose the first one.
__________________


The Dreamer's Manifesto

Mike Malloy, a voice of reason in a world gone mad.

"You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling." - Inception

"Man, I see in fight club the strongest and smartest men who've ever lived. I see all this potential, and I see squandering. God damn it, an entire generation pumping gas, waiting tables; slaves with white collars. Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy **** we don't need. We're the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War's a spiritual war... our Great Depression is our lives. We've all been raised on television to believe that one day we'd all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off." - Tyler Durden

Last edited by Tsyal Makto; 10-06-2010 at 03:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Visit our partner sites:

   



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:53 AM.

Based on the Planet Earth theme by Themes by Design


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All images and clips of Avatar are the exclusive property of 20th Century Fox.