Individualism Vs Collectivism

[Banefull]

Generally on this debate forum, I notice that a lot of disagreements arise as the result of an underlying contention between two opposing notions. The first of these is "individualism." Individualism is the belief in the primary importance of the individual and in the virtues of self-reliance and personal independence. On the opposite side is the idea of "collectivism." Collectivism states that the well being of the collective, the group, is considered more important than the individual who must sacrifice his self-interest for the good of the group.

Now before we all jump in with mighty claims saying that "invidualism always is better" or "collectivism always is better" it is important to note that few people are entirely collectivist and few people are completely individualist. For example: most people would agree that if it were in your interest to kill someone you should not be allowed to. Yet on the reverse side, most would agree that the majority should not be able to vote to kill someone if he or she becomes burdensome or a detriment.

Now let us apply this to issues that are less stark as the one above. Consider the question of the environment: Should people be able to exploit natural resources just for their own sake for profit? Should resources instead be devoted to providing for everyone instead? Another good example is population growth. Should we force people to limit their childbearing to keep the population down for the benefit of everyone? On the reverse side, you could say "you cannot force them too."

I myself am generally collectivist across the board but I do have individualist views. In the case of population growth, I would say that you should not force or coerce people into limiting childbearing. It is also important to clear up some potential misconceptions about collectivism and individualism. Collectivism does not necessarily mean that you support an authoritarian or powerful draconian government. If a government was highly parasitic, then it is not benefiting the populace and should be dismantled. If you are an individualist, you are not necessarily selfish. In some cases it can be in your best interest to see to the interests of others. The problem comes when we hit this grey area in which the choice between collectivism and individualism is not so apparent.

So what do you think takes priority? Individualism or Collectivism?